Risk-On Boosts Event Investing

Chidem Kurdas

Betting on corporate mergers, acquisitions, bankruptcies and restructurings is a high-risk business that requires patience. February turned out to be a very good month for such strategies. Moreover, investors appear to be willing to brave the uncertainty and illiquidity these event-driven strategies involve.

Recovery in risk taking helped special situation funds – an event-driven subset that specialize in distressed businesses – gain almost 3.5% in February, according to Lyxor. Merger and arbitrage funds made money from megadeals—- including Time Warner, Verizon, Forest Laboratories.

Investors who shunned event strategies in the aftermath of the crisis – such portfolios lost as much as 30% or more in 2008 – are coming back. Some of them favor long-time players in this niche such as Nelson Peltz, a veteran activist who recently told PepsiCo to separate its snack and beverage divisions as two public companies, having invested $1.2 billion in the PepsiCo stock.

But a relative newcomer is also attracting interest. This is Senator Investment Group, started in 2008 by Alexander Klabin and Douglas Silverman. Despite the initially difficult capital-raising environment, they had assets of $6.7 billion as of last month. No doubt it helped that that Blackstone Group provided seed capital (and recently bought a minority stake in the firm).

The necessity of having to wait for events to happen makes the strategy illiquid. Thus investments in the Senator Global Opportunity Fund require a lock-up and, even after that is over, are subject to a gating provision that no more than 25% can be redeemed in any one quarter.

That adds to the risk – there is no quick exit should expectations be disappointed – and was one of the issues that discouraged clients. But conditions have changed and event-driven funds look attractive. So much so that managers not in this sector are planning to start their own event-driven funds.

It all adds up to a bullish picture, encouraged by a rising stock market and accommodative Federal Reserve. The longer-term question is whether it will look as good when the Fed ends its money printing operation, also known as quantitative easing.


Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: