Chidem Kurdas
Investors don’t like the idea of having their money locked up. A noticeable aversion to long-term commitments – compared to before the 2008 crisis – appears to be here to stay.
But certain strategies are difficult or risky to carry out without a stable capital base. Managers with those strategies want to discourage redemptions, at least for new money coming into funds.
The answer may be a soft lock-up, a more flexible provision than the usual agreement to keep the capital in the fund for the first one or two years.
With a soft lockup, the investor has to pay a – usually hefty – fee to redeem within a certain time frame. For investors worried about possibly needing the money during the period, this provides a way out.
For managers, the extra fee is compensation for the inconvenience if the investor does withdraw during the specified time.
One-year soft lock-ups with a 2% early withdrawal fee have become fairly common, according to industry people. Some funds have sliding scales for early withdrawal fees, which decline over time and go to zero usually after a year.
Hard lock-ups have not disappeared and managers that have no trouble getting investors can still demand lengthy commitments. But most lock-ups are now limited to one year, whereas in the past they might have been two or even three years.
March 27, 2012 at 10:00 pm
[…] the investor pays a fee to redeem within a specified time frame, typically one year. When I reported the spread of soft lock-ups a couple of years ago, I mentioned that a 2% early withdrawal fee was fairly […]